Multiple Brand Infringement Cases in 6 Months: What a Major Indian Bank's Experience Tells Us About Online Brand Protection

Learn how a major Indian bank detected 2.37 lakh brand infringement cases and achieved 97%+ takedown success through continuous online brand protection.

Multiple Brand Infringement Cases in 6 Months: What a Major Indian Bank's Experience Tells Us About Online Brand Protection
Brand Infringement

2,37,565 brand infringement cases in just six months. That’s how vulnerable brands are to infringements and impersonations. What is a huge chunk from this number could be targeting your brand too? Not just scary but something that demands prompt attention and action. 

Fake websites impersonate your business. Fraudulent customer care numbers mislead customers. Social media accounts pretend to represent your company. All of this happens across multiple platforms, every single day. 

This is exactly what a major Indian bank discovered when it took a closer look at its digital presence between January and June. What it found revealed just how large and fast-moving online brand abuse can become when brands don't have complete visibility into their digital environment. 

In this blog, we'll look at the challenges the bank faced, the scale of the threats surrounding its brand, and the approach used to tackle them 

The Challenge: A Growing Digital Threat Landscape 

The bank was not unaware of online fraud. Like most large organizations, it already understood that cybercriminals, impersonators, and fraudsters frequently target well-known financial institutions. The challenge was something different. 

The bank needed a way to protect its brand across websites, social platforms, and other digital assets. However, it lacked a scalable system to continuously monitor the internet for violations. 

Three key issues stood out: 

  • There was no efficient way to monitor brand misuse across the web at scale. 
  • The digital landscape had become too large to track manually.  
  • The bank needed a solution that could grow alongside evolving threats.  

This situation is more common than many businesses think. Most organizations are not ignoring the problem, they simply do not have the infrastructure needed to detect and respond to threats across thousands of online touchpoints. 

What is Brand Infringement? 

Brand infringement is when a legal entity, person, or group uses a company’s name, logo and brand identity, or digital property without authorization and with the intent to mislead people, commit a crime, or gain an advantage in a way that is not legal or fair.

Overall Brand infringement has several consequences, and for banks, impacts on brand reputation are the least concern since it will most likely impact brand trust and customer security. 

What are the types of Brand Infringement that Banks will face in 2026? 

1. Fake Websites and Phishing Pages 

Frauds create a fake version of banking websites to steal customer credentials. 

2. Fake Customer Care Numbers 

Frauds publish unauthorized customer care numbers to trick customers to share their banking details. 

3. Impersonation of Social Media Accounts 

Frauds create fake profiles and use a bank’s brand to offer fake loans, fake investments, fake giveaways, and/or fake customer support. 

4. Fake Banking Apps 

Frauds create fake copies of banking apps to steal customer data. 

5. Fake Job Postings 

Frauds create fake recruitment opportunities to collect personal data under the pretext of a job posting. 

Each of the cases individually may seem a small concern, however collectively, they create an attack surface at large that is ever changing and may impact customer safety and trust. 

Why Manual Brand Monitoring Doesn’t Work in 2026 

The scale of the problem quickly makes manual monitoring unrealistic. 

Over the six-month period, the bank identified 2,37,565 cases. That translates to well over a thousand potential infringements every single day. 

No internal team can manually search every website, social media platform, marketplace, blog, forum, and search result around the clock. 

The internet does not operate on business hours. A phishing website can go live overnight. A fake social media profile can be created on a weekend. Fraudulent customer care numbers can appear in search results within hours. By the time a manual process discovers these threats, significant damage may already have been done. 

This is why technology has become a necessity rather than an option. At this scale, continuous monitoring is the only practical way to identify threats before they impact customers and the brand. 

How the Problem Was Approached with Advanced Brand Protection Solutions  

With multiple brand infringement cases emerging across the digital landscape, manual monitoring was no longer practical. The bank implemented a continuous brand protection solution designed to identify, verify, and act on threats, as well as gain complete visibility to respond faster.

1. OSINT-Powered Monitoring 

The capability to utilize Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) technology to investigate information across multiple channels of the internet has helped us identify threats to our brand, for example, the creation of fake websites, the setting up of imitating profiles, fake customer care numbers, etc. 

2. ML-Based Data Processing 

Machine learning automations have helped us clean, tag, and categorize massive volumes of data, thus helping sort out the infringement cases and helping prioritize them. 

3. AI-Assisted Verification 

The system was able to analyze images, videos, and documents in text form, to assign confidence scores to the different cases. Cases where confidence scores were low were submitted for human review. This helped us maintain the accuracy of the system while scaling to handle a large volume of threats. 

4. Unified Threat Dashboard 

All the cases and insights identified were consolidated to a single dashboard. This provided the teams with a centralized location to view fraudulent social handles, phishing pages, counterfeit customer care portals, and all other threats, thereby helping them make and execute quicker decisions. 

The Results: What OSINT-Led Brand Protection Delivered 

The outcomes demonstrate what is possible when brand protection is approached systematically. 

  • 2,37,565 total infringement cases identified  

  • 2,31,018 successful takedowns  

  • More than 97% takedown success rate  

  • Coverage across 10 platforms  

  • Average takedown time of 48 hours  

These numbers represent much more than operational efficiency. Every fake customer care number removed reduced the risk of customer fraud. Every phishing page taken down helped prevent stolen credentials. 

Every fraudulent social profile eliminated another opportunity for scammers to exploit customer trust. At this scale, effective brand protection directly contributes to customer safety, regulatory compliance, and brand reputation protection. 

Conclusion 

This case highlights a reality that many brands face today: online threats are constantly evolving, and brand misuse can appear across multiple digital channels without warning. 

The key lesson is simple, you can't protect what you can't see. With continuous monitoring, faster detection, and an efficient takedown process, brands can stay ahead of threats and better protect both their customers and their reputation. 

As demonstrated through mFilterIt's brand protection capabilities, a proactive approach to monitoring and enforcement can make all the difference. In today's digital-first world, brand protection is no longer a one-time effort, it's an ongoing business necessity. 

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is brand infringement in the banking sector? 

Brand infringement in banking occurs when unauthorized individuals misuse a bank's name, logo, website, or digital identity to deceive customers, commit fraud, or gain financial benefits. 

2. Why are banks frequently targeted by brand impersonation scams? 

Banks handle sensitive customer and financial information, making them attractive targets for fraudsters. Fake websites, phishing pages, and impersonating social media accounts are commonly used to exploit customer trust. 

3. What are the most common types of brand infringement banks face? 

Some of the most common threats include fake websites, phishing pages, fraudulent customer care numbers, impersonating social media profiles, fake mobile apps, and fraudulent job postings.