RPEng Australia: What Separates A Strong Application From The Rest
RPEng Australia, RPEng, Competency Report Writing, RPEng Australia Competency Report
Ankita Roy 
Two engineers with similar engineering backgrounds and experiences are using different structures to apply for RPEng Australia. Regardless of the difference in structures, the ultimate goal of their application is the same. Both of these engineers aim to demonstrate that they can provide the end user with high-quality, trustworthy engineering and are competent in the other facets of the engineering profession.
One of the criteria to demonstrate engineering competence to RPEng is for the applicants to describe their decision-making process when they faced a particular engineering problem. This should be coupled with describing how they justified their design and implemented the solution. A good example to use is to explain engineering challenges that applicants experience as part of their day-to-day work and the engineering profession.
Make Technical Judgment Visible
An exceptional engineer is one who considers multiple competing interests of design, including cost, safety, the environment, and performance, to name a few, promptly. Applicants should outline their design choices, why they made those choices, the factors and constraints they considered to make those choices, and why they considered other possibilities and why they rejected those other possibilities. It is not enough to just say why a choice was made, even with good reasons.
Use Examples
Being a good engineer means being a great problem solver. A case for the competency can be made by including past work examples, preferably recent examples that demonstrate the person is an exceptional engineer. This should include design contributions that solved design problems.
Also, engineering design contributions that were made to work completed by others can be used. Included can be design accomplishments, the engineering requirements to support the design, the design itself, and the work done to design around problems that came up during the engineering design. Project management accomplishments that resulted in the reduction of design engineering problems can be used to document competency in this area.
Applicants should use factual information rather than making things up. Good engineering narratives provide details in clear, professional language. Organization is critical to keeping the narrative understandable and concise. Assessors may view statements of repeated or unexplained work as ambiguous and unprofessional. Clear statements are essential. Competency Report Writing helps present these details clearly and professionally.
Summary
Engineering competency can be easily described through the decisions and the rationale for the work that demonstrates that competency. It is also true of RPEng Australia applications that exemplary professional work is at the center of the best RPEng Australia Competency Report. Clear examples of actual work are superior to claims that the profession might want to believe about you.
