Comparing Fixed vs Variable Angle Locking Plates in Distal Radius Fixation

Comparing Fixed vs Variable Angle Locking Plates in Distal Radius Fixation

Distal radius fractures are among the most common orthopedic injuries, especially in elderly patients with osteoporotic bones and young adults after high-energy trauma. Surgical fixation often becomes necessary when fractures are unstable or displaced. In the past two decades, locking plates have revolutionized the treatment of these fractures. But within this category lies a nuanced decision for surgeons: choosing between fixed angle locking plate and a locking variable angle distal radius plate. While both serve to stabilize the fracture and promote healing, their design, versatility, and clinical applications differ in meaningful ways.

  1. Understanding the Basics

Fixed angle locking plates have screw holes that direct the screws into the bone at a predetermined angle. Once inserted, these screws lock into the plate, creating a stable, rigid construct that is particularly useful in osteoporotic bone or multifragmentary fractures.

On the other hand, variable angle locking plates allow surgeons to insert screws within a defined cone of angles, often ±15° around a central axis. This provides a level of flexibility in screw placement, which can be beneficial in dealing with complex fracture patterns or avoiding previously placed hardware or anatomical obstacles.

  1. Surgical Flexibility and Fracture Coverage

One of the primary benefits of variable angle plates is their increased intraoperative adaptability. In many distal radius fractures, especially comminuted ones, it’s impossible to follow a predetermined screw trajectory. Surgeons often encounter tiny fragments or articular surfaces that require precise screw placement to prevent collapse and maintain joint congruity. Variable angle systems accommodate this by letting the surgeon tailor the screw trajectory for optimal fixation without compromising the locking mechanism.

Fixed angle plates, while extremely stable, can sometimes be limiting in such scenarios. If the fixed trajectory doesn’t align with the desired fragment, the surgeon may be forced to accept suboptimal fixation or reposition the entire plate, a less-than-ideal situation during surgery.

  1. Stability and Biomechanical Strength

When it comes to biomechanical stability, both systems provide strong fixation, particularly in osteoporotic bone. Fixed angle plates may offer slightly higher stiffness, especially when all screws are placed precisely and cortical purchase is good. This makes them a reliable choice in straightforward fractures, where the primary goal is rigid stabilization.

Variable angle plates, while offering comparable strength, depend more heavily on surgical precision. If screws are inserted at extreme angles within the permitted range, there may be a small compromise in locking strength. However, advancements in design have significantly reduced this concern, and most modern variable angle systems perform comparably in biomechanical studies.

  1. Clinical Outcomes and Evidence

Numerous clinical studies have compared the outcomes of fixed vs variable angle plates in distal radius fractures. Most show no significant difference in functional outcomes, union rates, or complication rates. However, variable angle plates have been associated with lower rates of secondary displacement in complex intra-articular fractures due to better subchondral support.

Additionally, surgeons report greater satisfaction and ease of use with variable angle plates in challenging fracture patterns. This subjective feedback, although less quantifiable, plays a crucial role in the choice of implant.

  1. Cost and Availability

One downside to variable angle plates is their higher cost compared to traditional fixed angle systems. In resource-limited settings or for simpler fracture patterns, this may influence decision-making. However, the extra investment often pays off in reduced surgical time, fewer intraoperative adjustments, and potentially better anatomical outcomes in complex cases.

Final Thoughts

Both fixed and variable angle locking plates are valuable tools in the orthopedic surgeon's arsenal. Fixed angle plates remain reliable for simple, extra-articular fractures with predictable trajectories. Variable angle plates, however, provide added versatility for managing comminuted, intra-articular fractures, where precision matters most.

Ultimately, the choice should be guided by fracture characteristics, patient needs, and surgical expertise. With thoughtful planning and implant selection, both systems can deliver excellent results in distal radius fixation.

To get a world-class range of variable angle plates and other trauma implants, explore the inventory of Siora Surgicals Pvt. Ltd., a renowned manufacturer and supplier of CE-certified orthopedic devices. With presence in over 50 countries, the company is also looking to expand as one of the trusted suppliers of orthopedic implants in Argentina.